Fell slews the anti-euro myth of some of the commentariat. In short, I agree with him.
Rewriting economic history won’t bring happy ending
CHARLIE FELL
SERIOUS MONEY: THE IRISH State and its people stand on the precipice. The
seemingly bottomless pit into which public monies continue to be sunk in
order to rescue the banking system, combined with already-stretched
finances, have raised concerns that a default by the Irish Government is
imminent.
International investors reacted to the stream of negative news flow, and
the premium for five-year Irish credit default swaps (CDS), soared to more
than 420 basis points, suggesting a cumulative default probability of 34
per cent, assuming a market-convention 40 per cent recovery rate.
The market stress is plain for all to see but the continued negativity
emanating from certain corners is unhelpful, particularly so given that
much of the analysis is simply incorrect. It has been argued with some
aplomb that the 10 per cent devaluation in 1993, following the
then-government’s aborted attempt to defend the currency, was the torch
that brought the Celtic Tiger to life.
This argument is followed by the contention that joining the euro at an
overvalued rate later in the decade contributed to subpar export
performance in the subsequent decade. It is this commentator’s belief that
such arguments are entirely false. If not for our commitment to the
European project, it is highly probable that Irish living standards would
still languish below the EU average.
There are several factors that coalesced to produce the extraordinary
growth of the Celtic Tiger years, though it is undoubtedly true that
Ireland’s commitment to Europe played a huge part in the transformation of
the economy.
The sense of urgency among US multinationals to establish operations in
Europe increased following the Single European Act, which came into effect
during the summer of 1987, and paved the way for the creation of a single
market by the end of 1992. US companies were provided with further impetus
to move to Europe after the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, and the subsequent
movement towards monetary union.
Intel arrived here in 1990 and the company’s action provided Ireland with
an important selling point, which was reinforced not only by the low
manufacturing tax rate and young English-speaking population, but also by
the UK’s decision to withdraw from the exchange rate mechanism (ERM) in
1992.
Almost every major US technology company followed Intel’s lead and, between
1991 and 1994, Ireland attracted roughly 40 per cent of all US electronics
investments in Europe.
The Irish success in attracting America’s best technology companies was
repeated with US healthcare companies, as one-by-one they chose Ireland as
their European home. By the early years of the new millennium, Ireland was
home to 13 of the world’s top 15 pharmaceutical companies and 16 of the top
20 medical-device companies.
The extraordinary accomplishment saw Ireland’s per capita stock of foreign
direct investment jump to second highest in the world and double the EU
average.
The timing was fortuitous, as both the US technology and pharmaceutical
sectors enjoyed a golden age in the mid- to late-1990s and Ireland
benefited handsomely. Irish exports expanded at a rate of almost 14 per
cent a year during the 1990s, and Ireland’s share of world exports jumped
from 0.64 to 1.22 per cent.
It was not a modest 10 per cent devaluation of the currency in 1993 that
precipitated this success, but undoubtedly the commitment to Europe.
The notion that Irish export performance has been decidedly poor since
joining the euro is also without merit. Analysis by Proinnsias Breathnach,
a senior lecturer at the National Institute for Regional and Spatial
Analysis at NUI Maynooth, demonstrates that Ireland’s export growth rate
from 2000 to 2007 was superior to that of 19 of the 29 other members of the
OECD. Furthermore, the State’s share of world exports increased over the
period, a trend that persisted during the “great recession”, as Irish
exports held up relatively well.
Our share of goods exports did drop following the dot.com collapse and
continued its descent as energy prices soared, but this has been easily
offset by a more than doubling of our share of services exports. The idea
that Ireland joined the euro at an overvalued rate is simply not supported
by the evidence.
Ireland’s recent economic history is being rewritten in certain corners,
and the State’s euro adventure is being blamed for all our economic ills.
This does the Irish people an extraordinary disservice and is downright
dangerous in these turbulent times.
Commitment to Europe propelled this State out of the dark ages, and to
argue otherwise, is simply not true. We would do well to heed the words of
Charles Haddon Spurgeon, who declared in 1855 that “a lie will go round the
world while the truth is pulling its boots on”.